Moore v. Golson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that plaintiff had adequately alleged the second requirement where there was inaccurate information in the files and omission of defendant’s sources allegedly impaired the ability to correct the errors
• noting that to show standing based on an “information injury,” “a plaintiff need only allege that she was denied information to which she was legally entitled, and that the denial caused some adverse consequences related to the purpose of the statute”
• discussing a line of cases that “explained that putative classes are not ascertainable where either a defendant’s records do not contain the information needed to ascertain the class or the records do not exist at all . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).