· 1/27/1916
Moore v. Furstenwerth-Uhl Jewelry Co.
Citations
- 17 Ga. App. 669
- 87 S.E. 1097
- 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 846
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the dismissal of the plaintiffs malicious prosecution claim because “the record does not reveal any evidence of defendant’s active involvement in the prosecution of plaintiff following the signing of the complaint”
- affirming summary judgment, as “the record demonstrates nothing more than defendant furnishing information regarding the incident to the police and signing a complaint against plaintiff” (collecting cases)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wade
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.