Skip to main content
· 1/27/1916

Moore v. Furstenwerth-Uhl Jewelry Co.

Citations

  • 17 Ga. App. 669
  • 87 S.E. 1097
  • 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the dismissal of the plaintiffs malicious prosecution claim because “the record does not reveal any evidence of defendant’s active involvement in the prosecution of plaintiff following the signing of the complaint”
  • affirming summary judgment, as “the record demonstrates nothing more than defendant furnishing information regarding the incident to the police and signing a complaint against plaintiff” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.