Moore v. Elkhorn Consolidated Coal & Coke Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the majority of courts dealing with data-breach cases post-Clapper have held that absent allegations of actual identity theft or other fraud, the increased risk of such harm alone is insufficient to satisfy Article III standing
• finding no standing where last four digits of customers’ credit card were stolen, but plaintiffs had not alleged any unauthorized purchases or other misuse
• “Even if Plaintiffs adequately allege a loss of privacy, they have failed to show how that loss amounts to a concrete and particularized injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).