Moore v. De Guire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts in the Second Circuit routinely find “a one-year delay in treating a cavity” as “evidence [of] deliberate indifference”
• “a one-year delay in treating a cavity can evidence deliberate indifference on the part of prison officials”
• “A serious medical condition exists where ‘the failure to treat a prisoner’s condition could result in further significant injury or the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.’” (quoting Chance v. Armstrong, 143 F.3d 698, 702 (2d Cir. 1998))
• applying deliberate indifference standard to dental treatment claim
• Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).