Moore v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a person authorized to receive mail is an authorized agent for purposes of receiving service of process in North Carolina”
• observing that “a person authorized to receive mail is an authorized agent for purposes of receiving service of process in North Carolina”
• observing that “a person authorized to receive mail is an authorized agent for purposes of receiving service of process in North Carolina”
• “[M]ail[ing] . . . the suit papers to a defendant’s place of employment is within the [state law] rule.”
• “To prove special damages from defamation, a plaintiffs allegations must evidence a pecuniary loss rather than simple humiliation.”
• Complaint sufficed where it alleged the defendant “communicated false information . . . to third persons . . . and the time frame in which the alleged misconduct took place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).