Moore v. Computer Associates International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disclosure of a corporate witness was not required under Rule 26(a) and denying motion to strike
• denying a motion to strike the affidavit of an undisclosed witness because the witness gave testimony that was “corporate in nature and could have been elicited from a number of Defendant's executives”
• the ADA does not guarantee an employee an 23 accommodation of his or her choosing, only a reasonable one
• the ADA does not guarantee 19 an employee an accommodation of his or her choosing, only a reasonable one
• Rule 26 does not require disclosure of corporate witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).