Moore v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the approach of the Gillies plurality that a waiver of the right to counsel is not knowing and voluntary, and hence not valid, unless the defendant is apprised of the charges and range of sentences
• adopting the approach of the Gillies plurality that a waiver of the right to counsel is not knowing and voluntary, and hence not valid, unless the defendant is apprised of the charges and range of sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Adkins
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1996-07-30· cited 68×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• Carnley v. Cochran
  Supreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
• Von Moltke v. Gillies
  Supreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,645×
• Napier v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1968-02-16· cited 34×
• Salisbury v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1967-06-30· cited 29×
• Howard v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1965-02-05· cited 12×
• Moore v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1972-11-17· cited 9×
• Jenkins v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1973-03-02· cited 8×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1966-05-06· cited 6×