Moore v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Mere acquiescence in, or approval of, the criminal act, without cooperation or agreement to cooperate in its commission, is not sufficient to constitute one an aider and abettor.”
• \mere presence at the scene of a crime is not sufficient to attach guilt\
• “mere presence at the scene of a crime is not sufficient to attach guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hayes v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 54×
• State v. Gazerro
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1980-09-17· cited 50×
• Osborne v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2001-04-26· cited 38×
• AMARO v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1968-08-16· cited 23×
• Rose v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1964-12-18· cited 14×
• McIntosh v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1979-02-09· cited 13×
• Rutland v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1979-10-30· cited 7×
• Warfield v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1960-04-22· cited 6×
• Espinoza v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-03-01· cited 6×
• Hunt v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1972-06-30· cited 2×
• Miller v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1965-10-22· cited 1×
• Begley v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1956-02-24