Skip to main content
· 10/30/1997

Moore v. Com., Cabinet for Human Res.

Citations

  • 954 S.W.2d 317
  • 1997 Ky. LEXIS 127
  • 1997 WL 677852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring a final judgment on the merits as an “essential element” of collateral estoppel
  • identifying four issues necessary to assert issue preclusion: “(1) identity of issues; (2) a final decision or judgment on the merits; (3) a necessary issue with the estopped party given a full and fair opportunity to litigate; (4) a prior losing litigant[]”
  • collateral es-toppel requires that the party have had “a full and fair opportunity to litigate” the prior suit
  • collateral estoppel requires that the party have had “a full and fair opportunity to litigate” the prior suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnstone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.