Moore v. Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “it is not enough that some extra quantum of procedure would redress a procedural harm—it must be reasonably capable of leading the agency to make a decision that would redress the underlying substantive harm”
• when a plaintiff asserts procedural injury such as failure to follow NEPA, Article III standing fails unless there is a reasonable chance that a court order requiring more procedure would lead to the desired substantive outcome
• noting Tenth Circuit’s abrogation of modified standard for preliminary relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).