Skip to main content
· 1/14/2010

Moore v. CHRONES

Citations

  • 687 F. Supp. 2d 1005
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3334
  • 2010 WL 291774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A challenge to a state court’s application of state 12 sentencing laws does not create a federal question cognizable in federal habeas 13 review.”
  • “A challenge to a state court’s application of state sentencing 12 laws does not create a federal question cognizable in federal habeas review.”
  • “[M]erely placing . . . a [due process] 24 label on an alleged state law sentencing violation is insufficient to 25 state a cognizable federal constitutional claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Philip S. Gutierrez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.