Moore v. Charles B. Pierce Film Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “action for invasion of privacy can be maintained only by a living individual whose privacy is invaded”
• “action for invasion of privacy can be maintained only by a living individual whose privacy is invaded”
• law is rightfully wary of claims for injuries which are purely emotional and where the difficulty of judging the validity.of complaints which are essentially subjective makes the damages of spurious actions substantial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).