· 12/20/2011
Moore v. Central Intelligence Agency
Citations
- 666 F.3d 1330
- 399 U.S. App. D.C. 63
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25212
- 2011 WL 6355313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a plaintiff must \pinpoint an agency record that both matches the plaintiff's request and has been publicly and officially acknowledged by the agency.\
- holding that a plaintiff must \pinpoint an agency record that both matches the plaintiff's request and has been publicly and officially acknowledged by the agency\
- holding that a plaintiff must \pinpoint an agency record that both matches the plaintiff's request and has been publicly and officially acknowledged by the agency\
- holding that a plaintiff must “pinpoint an agency record that both matches the plaintiff’s request and has been publicly and officially acknowledged by the agency”
- holding that a plaintiff must “pinpoint an agency record that both matches the plaintiff’s request and has been publicly and officially acknowledged by the agency”
- holding that a plaintiff must “pinpoint an agency record that both matches the plaintiff’s request and has been publicly and officially acknowledged by the agency”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Tatel, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.