Skip to main content
· 6/8/1961

Moore v. Bridgewater Tp.

Citations

  • 173 A.2d 430
  • 69 N.J. Super. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • installation of new equipment modernizing quarrying facility held to be valid as continuation of nonconforming use
  • “It is difficult, and also dangerous, to attempt to fix standards applicable in all cases; each case must be decided on its own facts.”
  • lawful nonconforming use of diminishing asset extends to the boundaries of original tract
  • lawful nonconforming use of diminishing asset extends to the boundaries of original tract
  • an owner of a quarry has the right to excavate from his land
  • because owner had made test holes throughout the property, marked off boundaries by erecting a fence, and surveyed the entire tract, it was “clear that the entire 20.47 acres . . . were dedicated” to excavation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Goldmann, Foley and Halpern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.