Moore v. Brancard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that court did not abuse discretion by denying motion to open judgment based on party’s “mere inattention” to date of pretrial conference
• “the court reasonably could have concluded that the plaintiffs failure to appear was due to mere inattention”
• motion that ‘‘included the bald assertion that a good cause of action still exists . . . failed to comply with the manda- tory dictates of § 52-212’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).