Moore v. Black Panther Party

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Brown Bag Software litigant described “sensitive nature of its” confidential business information, that litigant in this case advanced similar arguments, but relying on the “competitive decisionmaking” factor to decide the matter
• in-house counsel for party could examine documents covered by protective order even though that party had a “sizeable cadre of outside lawyers” allegedly making in-house review unnecessary, but opposing party conceded that in-house counsel did not participate in any competitive decisionmaking
• competitive decisionmaking is “arguably the determinative factor in this analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).