Moore v. Bird Engineering Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that transactions with engineers are covered by the KCPA and stating that “[t]he comfortable fit of the present parties and transaction within the statutory definitions confirms the district court’s impression that the KCPA applies”
• finding that an engineer who designed a bridge provided a service under the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).