Moore v. Betz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the rule that a principal-plaintiff is charged with the knowledge and conduct of his agents in conducting a transaction within the scope of their employment, in a context in which the defendant was alleged to have known the transaction was fraudulent
• discussing the rule that a principal-plaintiff is charged with the knowledge and conduct of his agents in conducting a transaction within the scope of their employment, in a context in which the defendant was alleged to have known the transaction was fraudulent
• “The object of a trial is to ascertain the truth of the facts in issue.”
• “[Wjhen a party to a transaction acts in collusion -with an officer of a bank, or knows or should know that the officer is acting beyond his authority and contrary to the best interests of the bank, the knowledge of the bank officer in such regard cannot be imputed to the bank.”
• “[WJhen a party to a transaction acts in collusion with an officer of a bank, or knows or should know that the officer is acting beyond his authority and contrary to the best interests of the bank, the knowledge of the bank officer in such regard cannot be imputed to the bank.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).