Moore v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding inter alia that plaintiffs claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress placed her mental condition in controversy
• overruling plaintiffs objection to evaluation by neuropsychologist after plaintiff had already submitted to examination by psychologist
• finding good cause for two Rule 35 examinations by experts in different specialties: one by a psychiatrist and another by a neuropsychologist
• \Peters has asserted such claims in the present action and concedes that her mental condition is \in controversy\ in the present matter.\
• also stating that courts were not “willing to order batteries of examinations by different specialists unless each was supported by good cause”
• plaintiffs claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress placed her mental condition in controversy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).