Skip to main content
· 11/9/1970

Moore v. Bean

Citations

  • 477 P.2d 823
  • 82 N.M. 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that trial court resolved uncertainty in the testator’s intent from the extrinsic evidence
  • considering extrinsic evidence and interpreting testator’s intent, court found charitable beneficiary to be intended devisee despite mistake in will regarding charity’s name and location
  • considering extrinsic evidence and interpreting testator's intent, court found charitable beneficiary to be intended devisee despite mistake in will regarding charity's name and location

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watson, Compton, McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.