Moor v. Teed

Citations

• 3 Cal. 190

Syllabus

<p>Where the action was brought against surgeons <c for mal-practice, by reason of which amputation became necessary,” it was held to be error for the court to instruct the jury, “ that if they believe, from the evidence, that the defendants were guilty of negligence, carelessness, or inattention, in their treatment of plaintiff’s wounds, by which he was caused great bodily pain and sufferings the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict.”</p>