Skip to main content
· 1/15/1876

Mooney v. People

Citations

  • 81 Ill. 134

Syllabus

<p>1. Recognizance—discrepancy in date and approval. A discrepancy in the date of a recognizance taken by a sheriff for a party’s appearance to answer an indictment, and of its approval, as, where the latter is one day prior to the date of the instrument, is unimportant, as it becomes a record only from the time it is filed in the clerk’s office.</p> <p>2. Same—recital of indictment. A recognizance which states that an indictment had heen found hy the grand jury of the proper county, and that the court required a bond for the appearance of the defendant, is substantially good. An omission to state the day, year and term at which the indictment was found, is of no importance.</p> <p>3. Same—misdescription of offense. It is no valid objection to a recognizance, that it recites the finding of an indictment for larceny only, when, in fact, it was for burglary and larceny. If it binds the defendant also to abide the order and judgment of the court, and not depart the same without leave, this will require the accused to appear and answ'er any other charge that may he preferred.</p> <p>4. Same—mistake as to date of ftrst day of term. If the undertaking in a recognizance in a criminal case is for the appearance of the accused on the first day of the next term of the court, a mistake as to the day of the month is immaterial, as he must take notice of the day on which the term commences.</p> <p>6. Same—who may object. Where the blanks in a printed form of recognizance are filled up by a party to it, he can not object to any insufficiency arising from the filling of the blanks, even though the objection he substantial in its character.</p> <p>6. Same—proof as to indictment. The production of an indictment against A and B is proof of an indictment against B, in a scire facias upon a recognizance given hy him. The indictment is several as to each.</p> <p>7. Pleading—mil tiel recognizance. Nul tiel recognizance is not a proper plea in scire facias upon a recognizance. The action,

Judges: Breese

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.