Skip to main content
· 5/6/1918

Mooney v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Citations

  • 261 Pa. 339
  • 104 A. 624
  • 1918 Pa. LEXIS 742

Syllabus

<p>Worhmen’s compensation law — Appeals to hoard — Granting of hearing de novo — Interlocutory order — Appeal to Common Pleas■ — • Mixed findings of fact and law.</p> <p>1. Where the Workmen’s Compensation Board concludes that the adjudication of a referee indicates that there was no evidence before him substantiating the allegation of the claim petition, and makes an order granting a hearing de novo, such ordey is interlocutory and from it no appeal lies.</p> <p>2. Where the conclusions of the referee comprehend mixed findings of fact and law, the compensation board is justified in treating the appeal to it as involving a question of fact, and in granting a hearing de novo.</p>

Judges: Frazer, Mestrezat, Moschzisker, Potter, Walling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.