Skip to main content
· 6/3/1986

Mooney v. Greater New Castle Development Corp.

Citations

  • 510 A.2d 344
  • 510 Pa. 516
  • 1986 Pa. LEXIS 784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying summary judgment request for formation of a constructive trust where claimants failed to show unjust enrichment via mistake by “clear, direct, precise, and convincing” evidence
  • “The Superior Court refused to decide this question because it was not set forth in the statement of questions involved as required by Pa. R.A.P. 2116; and therefore, it was not properly before that court. For this reason we will not consider the question.”
  • “The Superior Court refused to decide this question because it was not set forth in the statement of questions involved as required by Pa. R.A.P. 2116; and therefore, it was not properly before that court. For this reason, we will not consider the question.”
  • “The Superior Court refused to decide this question because it was not set forth in the statement of questions involved as required by Pa. R.A.P. 2116; and, therefore, it was not properly before that court. For this reason, we will not consider the question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.