Skip to main content

Moon v. State

Citations

  • 705 S.E.2d 649
  • 288 Ga. 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a co-conspirator’s statements would have been admissible against the defendant in a separate trial
  • holding that a co-conspirator’s statements would have been admissible against the defendant in a separate trial
  • holding that the defendant’s cellmate’s statement given to the police in a pre-trial interview did not predate the cellmate’s alleged motive to fabricate his testimony to obtain a plea deal on his pending federal drug charges
  • holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the order being appealed when appellant filed notice of appeal before trial court had ruled on motion for reconsideration
  • explaining that the appellant’s filing of a notice of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction over his motion for reconsideration
  • holding that “there was no likelihood of confusion by the jury as to the evidence and the law because there were only two defendants ‘who were jointly indicted for the same offenses, which involved the same witnesses, and the evidence indicated that they acted in concert’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.