Moog Incorporated v. Pegasus Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The District Court was right in finding a causal relationship between the withholding [of an agreement] and the termination of the interference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Richard F. Carella v. Starlight Archery and Pro Line Company
  Federal Circuit· 1986-12-12· cited 92×
• Cts Corporation v. Piher International Corporation and Piher Sociedad Anonima
  Federal Circuit· 1984-02-17· cited 20×
• Omark Industries, Inc. v. Carlton Co.
  D. Oregon· 1978-08-11· cited 3×
• United States v. FMC Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-05-21· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.
  Supreme Court· 1945-04-23· cited 1,028×
• United Tanks, Inc., and Bell-Toptex, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1970-04-29· cited 5×
• Moog, Inc. v. Pegasus Laboratories, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 1973-06-26· cited 4×
• Moog, Inc. v. Pegasus Laboratories, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 1974-05-07· cited 2×