Moody v. Palmer
Citations
- 50 Cal. 31
- 1875 Cal. LEXIS 78
Syllabus
<p>Land Bounded on a Street.—Land described in a deed as bounded by a public highway or street will be considered as bounded by the centre of the street, unless it clearly appears that it was intended to make the side line of the street a boundary, instead of the centre.</p> <p>When Deed Conveys Land to Centre op a Street.—A deed which bounds one side of the land conveyed, as extending five hundred feet to a street or avenue, and thence at right angles along the street or avenue one hundred and twenty feet to the place of beginning, conveys the fee of the land, subject to the public easement, to the centre oí the street or avenue, even if the five hundred feet extended only to the side of the street or avenue, and the one hundred and twenty feet passed along its side; and when the street ceases to be used as such, the grantee owns the land free of the easement.</p> <p>Idem.—In such deed it does not clearly appear that the side line, and not the centre line of the street, was intended to be the boundary.</p> <p>Consteuction on a Deed.—It is the province of the court to construe a deed received in evidence.</p>
Judges: Crockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court· 1878-01-09· cited 65×
- Neff v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-05-31· cited 58×
- Smith v. HornSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-12-10· cited 44×
- Pinsky v. SloatCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-02-03· cited 34×
- Gramer v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1935-02-19· cited 24×
- Weyl v. Sonoma Valley R.R.California Supreme Court· 1886-03-30· cited 19×
- City of Redlands v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-01-10· cited 17×
- Watkins v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-09-21· cited 11×
- Alameda Macadamizing Co. v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-08-30· cited 10×
- Fraser v. OttCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-08-19· cited 9×
- Brown v. WindlandSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1970-09-21· cited 9×
- Peninsular Point, Inc. v. South Georgia Dairy Co-Op, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-08-24· cited 8×
- Severo v. PachecoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-06-19· cited 6×
- Main v. LegnittoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-11-17· cited 6×
- United States v. 5.324 Acres of LandS.D. California· 1948-07-12· cited 5×
- Speer v. BlaskerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-08-24· cited 4×
- Freeman v. Affiliated Property CraftsmenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-10-22· cited 4×
- Faus v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1966-04-04· cited 4×
- Webber v. California & Oregon RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 3×
- Denver Union Water Co. v. Board of Co. Com'rsArapahoe County District Court· 1900-08-15
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Moody v. Palmer
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.