Supreme Court· 7/1/2024

Moody v. NetChoice, LLC

Citations

603 U.S. 707

Oral argument

Argued
122 min recording
Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that as-applied challenges are preferred because “facial challenges threaten to short circuit the democratic process”
explaining that “courts usually handle constitutional claims case by case, not en masse” (emphasis added)
instructing that a court’s overbreadth analysis must address “the law[’s] full range of applications” and place each application on one side of the scale
stating that the standard that applies to facial challenges based on the First Amendment “is whether ‘a substantial number of [the law’s] applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep’”
describing Texas law prohibiting social media companies from “deny[ing] equal access or visibility” based on political viewpoint
examining First 12 Amendment challenges to Florida and Texas laws that regulated social media platforms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elana Kagan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.