Skip to main content

Moody v. Moody

Citations

  • 681 S.W.2d 545
  • 1984 Tenn. LEXIS 898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • counsel’s knowledge must be -6- attributed to client if courts’ actions are to have any efficacy
  • “Counsel’s knowledge must be attributed to his client, if the actions of the court are to have any efficacy.”
  • “Counsel’s reviewed these affidavits. They show only that Daniel’s knowledge must be attributed to his client, if the actions of parents sought and were provided with a copy of his file from the court are to have any efficacy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.