Moody v. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that state constitutional provision barring unreasonable search and seizure is “self-executing” such that the court should imply an action for damages
• rejecting claim that state constitutional provision barring unreasonable search and seizure is “self-executing” such that the court should imply an action for damages
• rejecting claim that state constitutional provision barring unreasonable search and seizure is “self-executing” such that the court should imply an action for damages
• rejecting argument that protection against unreasonable search and seizure in Art. 1, § 15 is self-executing
• “[N]o Missouri precedent exists permitting suits for monetary damages by private individuals resulting from violations of the Missouri Constitution.”
• “Such claims are not cognizable because the Missouri General Assembly has not enacted legislation authorizing suits for state constitutional violations.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).