Moody v. Gilliam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming court’s conclusion that plaintiff had not exercised the greatest possible diligence when, more than seven weeks after she became aware that there was a problem with service, and after the statute of limitation expired, defendant still had not been served

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Diana Arias v. Joseph T. Cameron
  Eleventh Circuit· 2015-01-20· cited 68×
• James Giles v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-19· cited 44×
• Parker v. Silviano
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-19· cited 31×
• James H. Wilson, III v. Hearos, LLC
  Eleventh Circuit· 2025-02-18· cited 16×
• Classic Commercial Services, Inc. v. Baldwin
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-03-14· cited 11×
• Choice v. Florida Men’s Medical Clinic
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-06-28
• Kyle Lee Van Omen v. Irina Teresa Lopresti
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-10-21
• Richard S. Griffin v. George Trinidad
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-10-30
• Classic Commercial Services, Inc. v. Robert Baldwin
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-03-14
• MICHELE M. BARDIN v. JOSEPH T. LINDSEY
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-09-16
• Moises Rodriguez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-11-03

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cantin v. Justice
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-01-07· cited 16×
• McDonald v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-08-16· cited 9×
• Kelley v. Lymon
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-06-16· cited 9×
• Douglas v. Seidl
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-08-08· cited 6×
• Palmer v. Constantin
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-06-13· cited 6×
• Hardy v. Lucio
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-02-11· cited 3×