Moody v. Flowers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding local ordinances are not state statutes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2281, requiring convening of a three-judge district court to enjoin a state statute
• noting the “immediate severity of the regulations’ impact upon the plaintiffs”
• “[A] three-judge court was improperly convened. Appeals should, therefore, have been taken to the respective Courts of Appeals, not to this Court.”
• county enjoined from interfering with public housing by refusing building permits
• improperly before a three-judge court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).