· 3/24/1932
Moody v. Farinholt
Citations
- 158 Va. 234
- 164 S.E. 258
- 1932 Va. LEXIS 251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding EAJA did not apply against a purely adjudicative agency
- holding EAJA did not apply against a purely adjudicative agency
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.