Moody-Herrera v. State, Department of Natural Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 82 governed fee award to prevailing defendant in action under Alaska Human Rights Act because Act included no fee provision, but suggesting that Rule 82 would be inapplicable if provision similar to federal civil rights act fee provision had existed
• \[AHRA] imposes a duty on an employer to reasonably accommodate a disabled employee.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).