Monument Associates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff did not establish that a supervisor who took the adverse employment action knew of the protected activity when (1) the plaintiff only provided evidence that the supervisor talked with others who knew of the protected activity, (2
• affirming a district court’s summary judgment grant when the employee could not show that the “decision-maker[] knew of the alleged protected activity and she could not establish a causal connection between her protected activity and” adverse employment action
• “[c]laims under [the ELCRA and §1981] are analyzed under the framework developed for claims brought under Title VII”.
• “An employment decision cannot be caused by protected activity if the decision-maker did not know about the protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).