Montoya v. Montoya

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if antenuptial agreement is “unambiguous within its four comers,” parties’ intent is question of law necessitating plenary review
• “[i]f a contract is unambiguous within its four comers, intent of the parties is a question of law requiring plenary review” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “Where the language of the contract is clear and unambiguous, the contract is to be given effect according to its terms.”
• ‘‘we assume a deliberately prepared and executed agreement reflects the intention of the parties’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• court decided question relating to attorney's fees in name of judicial economy even though it was not part of certified question, where both counsel briefed and argued issue in Supreme Court
• court decided question relating to attorney’s fees in name of judicial economy even though it was not part of certified question, where both counsel briefed and argued issue in Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).