Montoya v. Kirk-Mayer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disputed factual issue existed as to whether claimant knew, or by exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known prior to running of statute of limitations existence of compensable claim
• stating that summary judgment is improper when equally logical but conflicting inferences can be drawn from undisputable basic facts
• stating that summary judgment is improper when equally logical but conflicting inferences can be drawn from undisputable basic facts
• holding that due to the factual 18 nature of inquiry, the statute of limitations is not automatically tolled until a worker 19 is actually told by a health care provider that he or she has suffered a permanent 20 impairment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).