Montoya v. Gonzalez
Citations
- 232 U.S. 375
- 34 S. Ct. 413
- 58 L. Ed. 645
- 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1366
Syllabus
<p>The disposition of this court is to leave decisions of the territorial court on questions of local procedure undisturbed.'</p> <p>The Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico having construed the statute permitting intervention in partition during the pendency of the suit as allowing an intervention after the judgment for parti-, tion and report of commissioners that actual partition could not be made, but before the. final action of the court on such report, this court approves that construction. Clark v. Boiler, 199 U. S. 541.</p> <p>A statute of limitations may give title.</p> <p>The evident purpose of the statute of New Mexico, giving title under a deed purporting to convey a fee simplé after ten years to lands included in grants by Spain, Mexico or the United States, is to ripen disseisin into title and is not unconstitutional as taking property without due process of law.</p> <p>Nor does such statute deny equal protection of the law by its classification of Spanish, Mexican and United States grants; such a classification in the Territory of New Mexico is a reasonable one to prevent the evil of attempts to revive stale claims in regard to such grants.</p>
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michigan v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1926-03-01· cited 34×
- O'NEIL v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court· 1916-11-20· cited 27×
- Prude v. LewisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-07-24· cited 20×
- Herbert v. BicknellSupreme Court· 1914-04-06· cited 16×
- Bradford v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1922-07-28· cited 15×
- Hushaw v. Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1939-01-28· cited 14×
- Garcia v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1930-09-23· cited 11×
- Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1958-06-03· cited 6×
- Gallegos v. WarNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-01-15· cited 5×
- In re Carlisle Packing Co.W.D. Washington· 1935-04-22· cited 5×
- Deakyne v. Commissioners of LewesD. Delaware· 1971-08-04· cited 5×
- United States v. Dennis Garcia and Eliza L. Garcia, Individually and Doing Business as Den-Gar EnterprisesTenth Circuit· 1985-05-24
- Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co. v. HushawSupreme Court· 1939-06-05
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. MillsSupreme Court· 1904-05-16· cited 237×
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court· 1908-04-20· cited 73×
- Tiaco v. ForbesSupreme Court· 1913-05-05· cited 62×
- Gray v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1913-01-20· cited 30×
- Clark v. RollerSupreme Court· 1905-12-04· cited 27×
- Soper v. Lawrence Brothers Co.Supreme Court· 1906-04-02· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.