Monti v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is Court’s policy not to consider constitutional questions when not necessary to final determination
• reviewing court’s denial of motion for protective order for abuse of discretion
• highly-placed executive branch governmental official should not be called upon personally to give testimony by deposition, at least unless a clear showing is made that such a proceeding is essential to prevent prejudice or injustice to the party requesting it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).