Nevada Supreme Court· 5/30/1996
Montgomery v. State
Citations
- 112 Nev. 719
- 917 P.2d 949
- 1996 Nev. LEXIS 89
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that in considering failure to adjust cases, \Nile main concern is permanency of adjustment — a child should not be held in limbo indefinitely\
- explaining that \[i]ntent is the decisive factor in [determining] abandonment and may be shown by the facts and circumstances\ of the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Shearing, Springer, Steffen, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Richard J. K. v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-03· cited 25×
- Matter of Parental Rights as to QLRNevada Supreme Court· 2002-09-18· cited 13×
- Matter of Parental Rights as to NJNevada Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 13×
- Gonzales v. Department of Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court· 1997-02-26· cited 10×
- Matter of Parental Rights of MontgomeryNevada Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 7×
- Matter of Parental Rights as to KDLNevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-03· cited 5×
- Sam Z. v. HikmetNevada Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 2×
- IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP OF N.M.Nevada Supreme Court· 2015-09-24
- In Re: Parental Rights As To K.C.Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-12-16
- In Re: Parental Rights As To S.V.Nevada Supreme Court· 2022-08-11
- IN RE: PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO S.A.T. (FAMILY)Nevada Supreme Court· 2025-10-02
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.