Skip to main content

Citations

  • 263 A.D.2d 665
  • 693 N.Y.S.2d 293
  • 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2627
  • 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jurisdiction was proper where “it [wa]s undisputed that all of the operative facts giving rise to plaintiff’s claims occurred in this State”
  • holding that an allegedly defamatory news report written and researched in New York over a six-week period and broadcast in New York was sufficient to support transaction of business within the state
  • noting that “personal jurisdiction over a nondomiciliary defendant in a' defamation action has been sustained under CPLR 302(a)(1) where the action arises out of a defendant’s transaction of business in New York”
  • finding personal jurisdiction over defendant, a reporter, who based TV news report on six weeks of research conducted in New York
  • exercising jurisdiction over the creators of an allegedly defamatory television news report because the operative facts giving rise to plaintiff’s claims occurred in New York
  • “The newscasts were researched, written, [and] produced . . . in this State.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Montgomery v. Minarcin

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.