Montgomery v. Kingsland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a]dditional details that the defendant needs in order to prepare for trial[, beyond those required to prepare and answer,] should be obtained by discovery after issue is joined” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilson v. Government of District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-07-30· cited 38×
• Liquor Control Commission v. Atlas
  Utah Supreme Court· 1952-04-10· cited 16×
• Kuenzell v. United States
  N.D. California· 1957-01-03· cited 11×
• Lodge 743, International Ass'n of Machinists v. United Aircraft Corp.
  D. Connecticut· 1962-03-26· cited 3×
• Wilson v. Government of the District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2010-07-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.
  E.D. Arkansas· 1940-02-09· cited 19×
• United States v. Griffith Amusement Co.
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1940-04-04· cited 12×
• Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. Rothensies
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1941-04-02· cited 6×
• American Broadcasting Co. v. Wahl Company
  S.D. New York· 1940-09-25· cited 4×
• Zimmerman v. Fillah
  District of Columbia· 1946-01-22· cited 4×
• Cooper v. Chase & Co.
  S.D. Florida· 1942-04-01· cited 3×