Montgomery v. Hutchins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denial of a motion seeking discovery of an attorney retainer/fee agreement was proper as it was “irrelevant,” even though the gravamen of the case was the reasonableness of those attorney fees
• “Rulings concerning the scope of discovery are generally reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
• pending discovery dispute mooted by disposition of underlying cause of action
• “[U]nder federal law, in the absence of explicit statutory direction on the issue, the award of prejudgment interest is . . . in the discretion of the court.”
• “[U]nder federal law, in the absence of explicit statutory direction on the issue, the award of prejudgment interest is . . . in the discretion of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).