Montgomery v. Gooding, Huffman, Kelly & Becker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Violations of the rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility, however, do not constitute malpractice per se.”
• “* * * Ohio law does not require expert witness evidence to establish proximate cause in legal malpractice actions.”
• “Violations of the rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility, however, do not constitute malpractice per se.”
• “Violations of the rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility, however, do not constitute malpractice per se.”
• “Violation of the disciplinary rules constitutes some evidence of negligence. In a legal malpractice action, expert testimony upon the standard of care is usually required.” (Citation omitted.)
• “Violation of the disciplinary rules constitutes some evidence of negligence. In a legal malpractice action, expert testimony upon the standard of care is usually required.” (Citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).