Skip to main content
· 7/13/1990

Montgomery v. Docter, Docter & Salus, P.C.

Citations

  • 578 A.2d 176
  • 1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 162
  • 1990 WL 118964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding notice of appeal was timely filed despite the fact the irregularity was cured one day after time requirement
  • holding notice of appeal was timely filed despite the fact the irregularity was cured one day after time requirement
  • payment of a filing fee and filing of copies of the notice of appeal, as required by the appellate rules, held “not a jurisdictional prerequisite,” albeit the latter filing requirement is “essential to the processing of an appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferren, Steadman, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.