· 7/13/1990
Montgomery v. Docter, Docter & Salus, P.C.
Citations
- 578 A.2d 176
- 1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 162
- 1990 WL 118964
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding notice of appeal was timely filed despite the fact the irregularity was cured one day after time requirement
- holding notice of appeal was timely filed despite the fact the irregularity was cured one day after time requirement
- payment of a filing fee and filing of copies of the notice of appeal, as required by the appellate rules, held “not a jurisdictional prerequisite,” albeit the latter filing requirement is “essential to the processing of an appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferren, Steadman, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.