Montgomery v. Branon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that continuity was not broken by seasonal use of summer camp because, given the nature of the property, there could be “lapses of time between acts of possession”
• holding that continuity was not broken by seasonal use of summer camp because, given the nature of the property, there could be “lapses of time between acts of possession”
• “The occupancy need[ ] only to be that consistent with the nature and character of the premises ... as well as the uses to which it is adapted.” (quotation omitted)
• “The occupancy need[ ] only to be that consistent with the nature and character of the premises . . . as well as the uses to which it is adapted.” ( quotation omitted)
• using hunting camp only during season

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jarvis v. Gillespie
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-01-18· cited 40×
• Darling v. Ennis
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-04-17· cited 32×
• Hilliker v. Husband
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1974-10-01· cited 12×
• Town of Castleton v. Fucci
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1981-06-02· cited 8×
• Rueda v. Kuban
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-12-02· cited 4×
• Parker v. Potter
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-09-12· cited 1×
• Aubin v. Morse
  Vermont Superior Court· 2014-10-01
• Helm v. Helm
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-04-08