Montgomery v. Birge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the special master did not abuse his discretion in reducing number of hours for Federal Circuit appeal
• noting that in making reductions, a line-by-line evaluation of the fee application is not required
• explaining that special masters are not obligated to engage in line-by-line analysis of fee applications
• noting that an experienced attorney who charges a relatively high hourly rate may be expected to perform some tasks in less time than inexperienced attorneys with lower hourly rates
• noting that an experienced attorney who charges a relatively high hourly rate may be expected to perform some tasks in less time than inexperienced attorneys with lower hourly rates
• noting that an experienced attorney who charges a relatively high hourly rate may be expected to perform some tasks in less time than inexperienced attorneys with lower hourly rates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).