Skip to main content
· 1/27/2014

Montgomery County, Maryland v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

Citations

  • 740 F.3d 914
  • 2014 WL 279852
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Congress could “rationally have believed that state taxation would substantially interfere with or obstruct the legitimate purposes of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac”
  • “[T]he ultimate goals of the statutory scheme at issue in this case are to stabilize the secondary mortgage market and to promote liquidity in that market, which are quintessentially interstate and economic aims.”
  • “[CJonstitutional and statutory tax exemptions are distinct concepts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Traxler, Niemeyer, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.