Skip to main content
· 11/10/2004

Montgomery County Board of Education v. Horace Mann Insurance

Citations

  • 860 A.2d 909
  • 383 Md. 527
  • 2004 Md. LEXIS 719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no genuine disputes as to material facts because the sole question to be resolved by the court was the legal interpretation of “relevant statutes, the various insurance agreements between the parties, and the Complaint,” and granting summary judgment
  • finding no genuine disputes as to material facts because the sole question to be resolved by the court was the legal interpretation of “relevant statutes, the various insurance agreements between the parties, and the Complaint,” and granting summary judgment
  • “It would be wholly inconsistent-with our case law — case law that predates the enactment of the statutes now contained in §§ 4-104(d
  • “[I]n Maryland, a trial court has some discretion to deny summary judgment even when it could grant that relief.... ”
  • “[I]n Maryland, a trial court has some discretion to deny summary judgment even when it could grant that relief . . . .”
  • “Apart from being malicious, sexual abuse of a minor is criminal conduct that is not within the scope of a teacher’s employment or authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.