Montessi v. American Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “plaintiff's cursory allegations in opposition to the motion are wholly insufficient to establish a genuine issue of material fact to withstand summary judgment.”
• ultimately quoting Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp., 613 F. 2d 438, 445 (2d Cir. 1980)
• “[T]he bald statement ... that [plaintiff! is suffering ... ailments ‘as a result of the ... incidents’ complained of — is the epitome of a legal conclusion and thus insufficient to establish a genuine issue of material fact for trial.”
• “[T]he bald statement . . . that [plaintiff] is suffering . . . ailments as a result of the incidents complained of – is the epitome of a legal conclusion and thus insufficient to establish a genuine issue of material fact for trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).